Nikki Haley Had a Dozen Lucrative Speaking Engagements Since Last Year, Financial Disclosure Shows

by Madeleine Hubbard

 

Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley received between $100,001 and $1 million for each of her dozen speaking engagements in 2022 and 2023, which means she made at least $1.2 million from speaking honorariums, her financial disclosure report shows.

Haley, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and former South Carolina governor, received payments for her speeches in Singapore, Australia and Canada, as well as for talks she gave across the U.S. in cities such as Chicago, New York and Dallas, according to her disclosure filed Monday. The speeches were for a variety of organizations such as the National Automobile Dealers Association and the Canadian Friends of Jerusalem College of Technology.

The speeches were all given before Haley entered the presidential race in February.

All presidential candidates are required to file annual financial disclosures within 30 days of announcing their candidacy or by May 15, whichever is later, according to CNN.

Haley also reported earning between $100,001 and $1 million for her 2022 book, “If You Want Something Done.” She reported earning that same amount in consulting fees from consulting firm Prism Global Management and from the asset holding company Little Engine Inc., which Haley runs with her husband.

– – –

Madeleine Hubbard is an international correspondent for Just the News.
Photo “Nikki Haley” by Nikki Haley.

 

 

 


Reprinted with permission from Just the News 

Related posts

One Thought to “Nikki Haley Had a Dozen Lucrative Speaking Engagements Since Last Year, Financial Disclosure Shows”

  1. Joe Blow

    She needs to get a lot more gigs like this to keep her living at the level she “deserves”. She sure as heck has no chance to be president. I would like the opportunity to inquire of her regarding her kneejerk decision to remove the flag from the South Carolina state capital. That is exactly the type of behavior that we DO not need at the federal level.

Comments